Learn about protecting yourself and your organization from cyber threats.
Hear from Rob Rudloff, a Cyber Security services team leader from RubinBrown and Matt Flinner, Better Business Bureau Education and Outreach Coordinator.
The key points of the presentation will cover the steps for concrete prevention and remedies of today’s greatest cyber threats, the latest information on emerging threats and tactics used by cyber criminals, and effective strategies for minimizing your risk of identity theft online.
There will be appetizers and a cash bar!
Cost is $20 a person, purchasing a whole table with 8 spots is $120.
Pay by mail to:
Robert Foster, Executive Director
World Affairs Council
812 Olive Street, Suite 110, St. Louis MO 63101
or pay at the door.
The final event of this 8 part series sponsored by UM-St. Louis is on Wednesday, April 25th at the Ethical Society of St. Louis. The topic is: Global Health: Progress and Challenges
The schedule for this event is:
12:00 Noon to 12:15 PM: Introduction of moderator and showing of portions of the FPA Video for the topic being discussed.
12:15 PM to 12:45 PM: Remarks by the moderator
12:45 PM to 1:15 PM: Q&A followed by a brief summation
Light refreshments, consisting of coffee and cookies, will be available to all participants in the meeting room at no charge.
Parking is free and convenient, located in the rear of the building on the north side. The parking lot is accessible from Clayton Road.
“How did it look to have an elections where everyone knew what the outcome would be?” That’s the question Dr. Ellen Carnaghan of Saint Louis University wanted to answer by visiting Russia during the March 18 presidential elections.
She shared details of her trip as part of the World Affairs Council of St. Louis’ Great Decisions series April 5. One example of the strangeness: The presidential debates, which often devolved into shouting matches between the challengers to President Vladimir Putin, reflecting badly on all involved. Putin, meantime, stayed above the fray, “looking presidential and doing presidential things” in state-controlled media coverage.
Putin as expected won handily, but his victory might not be fully satisfying, Carnaghan said. “Autocrats seem to be secure in their regimes to outside observers but they don’t FEEL secure,” she said.
“Regimes near him have fallen,” she said, noting the Rose Revolution in Georgia in 2003, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2004 and Euromaidan unrest in 2013-14. She said Putin’s regime is vulnerable on issues such as corruption, a potential economic downturn or unseen popular sentiment.
Operating in Putin’s favor: The GDP of Russia has grown during Putin’s regime and with it, the living standard of most Russians.
Also operating in his favor: Control of the press allows Russia to shape opinions of the unrest in Ukraine and assertions of Russian interference in U.S. elections.
On that topic, she said the U.S. response has been rather mild: sanctions and the expulsion of diplomats.
In general, “the checks and balances that we political scientists know are important don’t exist in Russia,” she said. “There’s no free press and no independent judiciary.” Both factors were crucial to controlling the March election and assuring Putin a third six-year term.
On a day when fears of a trade war with China sent the Dow Jones Industrial Index plummeting, UM-St. Louis Associate Provost Dr. Joel Glassman described the complex relations between the U.S. and China as part of the World Affairs Council of St. Louis’ Great Decisions series March 22.
Headlined “China and America: the New Geopolitical Equation”, the presentation was focused on flashpoints such as the status of Taiwan and domination of the South China Sea, which Dr. Glassman observed could both be “resolved” if China chose to do so. On those issues, and with North Korea, he praised the U.S. and China for “agreeing not to fight against each other.” While the issues remain unresolved, tensions are not escalating and that’s a net positive in Dr. Glassman’s view.
Similarly, North Korea has become less of a flashpoint in recent weeks after the U.S. stopped insisting that China “resolve” the North Korean regime’s quest for nuclear weapons. “The U.S. in the last few weeks has decided China will not resolve the problem for us,” Dr. Glassman observed.
In regard to the idea of imposing tariffs on Chinese imports to the U.S., Dr. Glassman stated “tariffs only impoverish all parties.” He further explored the potential impact on the local economy, focusing on the negative impact that proposed tariffs would have on Missouri farmers.
As a university professor, he also noted a trade war with China could have an enormous impact on higher education in the U.S. if visas are restricted, as one-third of international students at U.S. institutions are from China. Overall, the economic impact of these students is $40 billion he said.
Offering her view of the sometimes conflicting agendas of the West and Turkey, Dr. Tahmineh Entessar, retired assistant director of the International Relations Graduate Program at Webster University, spelled out challenges from political fissures, to the role of the Kurds, to Cyprus and the often fraught relationship with NATO in a talk March 15, presented by WAC-STL in partnership with UMSL International Studies and Program.
Of all NATO allies, Turkey represents the most daunting challenge for the Trump administration. In the wake of a failed military coup in July 2016, the autocratic trend in Ankara took a turn for the worse. One year on, an overwhelming majority of the population considers the United States to be their country’s greatest security threat. In this age of a worsening “clash of civilizations” between Islam and the West, even more important than its place on the map is what Turkey symbolically represents as the most institutionally Westernized Muslim country in the world.
America’s changing role in the world, from asserting industrial and cultural dominance to isolationist positions, was the topic of the first Great Decisions program of 2018. Hosted by the World Affairs Council of St. Louis in partnership with University of Missouri – St. Louis International Studies and Programs, the series takes a foreign policy topic each week and showcases a film on the topic, an expert’s overview and allows audience questions.
This week’s speaker and host was J. Martin Rochester, Ph.D., distinguished teaching professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. Among his observations: “Power isn’t what it used to be.” In his view, the ability of the U.S. to shape world policies, from human rights, to environmental issues, to voting rights and trade, has diminished.
“Power isn’t what it used to be.”
He likens the new environment to the plight of Gulliver, referencing his book, Gulliver’s Travails, in which a giant is subdued by smaller, seemingly weaker people. The rise of rogue states and competing global factions makes it harder to exert influence, even as America exhibits a strong trend of isolationism. Dr. Rochester weighed whether other countries can fill the vacuum and whether the U.S. will reassert itself in the shifting balance of nations.
Paul B. Stares, senior Fellow and Director of the Center for Preventative Action at the Council of Foreign Relations, discussed strategies for preventing global conflict and a framework for meeting the challenges of potential world hotspots during a WAC-STL forum Jan. 24.
He proposes an innovative and timely strategy—“preventive engagement”—to resolve America’s predicament. This approach entails pursuing three complementary courses of action: promoting policies known to lessen the risk of violent conflict over the long term; anticipating and averting those crises likely to lead to costly military commitments in the medium term; and managing ongoing conflicts in the short term before they escalate further and exert pressure on the United States to intervene.
In each of these efforts, forging “preventive partnerships” with a variety of international actors, including the United Nations, regional organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and the business community, is essential. The need to think and act ahead that lies at the heart of a preventive engagement strategy requires the United States to become less shortsighted and reactive. Drawing on successful strategies in other areas, Preventive Engagement provides a detailed and comprehensive blueprint for the United States to shape the future and reduce the potential dangers ahead.
Paul B. Stares is the General John W. Vessey Senior Fellow for Conflict Prevention and director of the Center for Preventive Action at the Council on Foreign Relations. The author or editor of nine books on U.S. security policy and international relations as well as a regular commentator on current affairs, Stares has worked at leading think tanks and universities in the United States, Britain, and Japan. He lives in the Washington, D.C., area.